Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE 1.
Respondent demographics.
(A) Pie chart illustrating the number of responding students in each of the four categories. The absolute number of students in each category is listed next to each group in the legend. (B) Frequency of non-IMM majors and IMM in terms of race/ethnicity, sex, and age. χ2 analysis; *p < 0.05. ns, not significant.
- FIGURE 2.
Both immunology majors and nonmajors reported being introduced to immunology through an educational encounter.
Frequency of (A) total respondents, (B) undergraduate students, or (C) graduate students. χ2 analysis; *p < 0.05. ns, not significant.
- FIGURE 3.
The timing of an educational introduction to immunology may be more influential on the selection of immunology by graduate students compared with undergraduate students.
Frequency of (A) total respondents, (B) undergraduate, or (C) graduate students answering at what point in their academic career that they had this educational experience. χ2 analysis; *p < 0.05. ns, not significant.
- FIGURE 4.
Types of educational experience reported by survey respondents.
Responses from (A) undergraduate and (B) graduate students.
- FIGURE 5.
Types of influential educational experience described by graduate student interviewees.
- FIGURE 6.
Both immunology majors and nonmajors report being introduced to immunology through a personal experience.
(A) Frequency of respondents who reported either being introduced to immunology through a personal experience or not. (B) Timing at which students were exposed to immunology by a personal experience. χ2 analysis; *p < 0.05. ns, not significant.
- FIGURE 7.
Types of personal experience reported by respondents.
Responses from (A) undergraduate or (B) graduate students.
- FIGURE 8.
Percentage of immunology majors reporting on whether an educational or personal/other experience was most influential in choosing to pursue an immunology major. χ2 analysis; *p < 0.05. ns, not significant.
In this issue
